So far in our inquiry into David Bohm’s masterwork, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Bohm has been eager for us to understand what he means by “wholeness” by contrasting this with its manifestly contrary state “fragmentation”. Bohm has not yet introduced in the book his understanding of “implicate order” within this foundational reality of wholeness or one-ness (which is where matters will become very interesting indeed).
Let us, then, first become very clear about the meaning of “Undivided Wholeness in Flowing Movement” (also called “the holomovement”) before we turn to the issue of the implicate order within this Universal Flux.
View original post 1,968 more words